Case 2414431/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Rebecca Marsden v Marsden Inns Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414431/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Rebecca Marsden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment given because the respondent did not lodge a response form. On the material available, Employment Judge Hoey declared that Marsden Inns Limited had failed to pay Rebecca Marsden the holiday entitlement due to her on termination of employment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £144.76, calculated in the judgment as 18.8 days at £7.70 per day. The listed hearing on 21 January 2020 was cancelled.
The accompanying notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 stated that unpaid sums would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the decision was sent, at the stipulated rate of 8%, but no separate interest amount was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment in the absence of a response form. The tribunal held the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement due on termination and ordered payment of the gross sum of £144.76, calculated as 18.8 x £7.70. | Upheld | — | £145 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £145
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.