Case 2414433/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Squire v Mr Sivagnanam Gnanachandran t/a Dales Off Licence & News HELD AT: Manchester (in person) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414433/2021
- Decision date
- 6 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Squire
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing, the claimant pursued strike out and deposit order applications concerning disability discrimination, failure to provide a section 1 statement, and unlawful deduction from wages matters including holiday pay, statutory sick pay, and National Minimum Wage. The tribunal noted disputes about the effective date of termination, knowledge, dismissal, and working pattern that required evidence at a full hearing.
The tribunal struck out the respondent's defence to the holiday pay claim, framed as an unlawful deduction from wages, because it found the claim was in time and there was no defence to the agreed fact that the claimant had not been paid holiday pay. The value of that claim and the period recoverable were left for a remedy hearing.
The tribunal refused the remaining strike out applications. It made deposit orders in respect of the section 1 statement claim and the statutory sick pay claim, with reasons contained in a separate document, and declined to make a deposit order for the National Minimum Wage claim.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal declined to strike out the defence to the section 15 discrimination arising from disability claim and declined to make a deposit order; liability was not finally determined. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal declined to strike out the defence to the section 13 direct discrimination claim; liability was not finally determined. | Other | Disability | — |
| Other | The claim for failure to provide a section 1 statement was not struck out, but a deposit order was made in separate reasons; liability was not finally determined. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The response was struck out insofar as it defended the unlawful deduction from wages claim regarding holiday pay. The value of the holiday pay claim was left to a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declined to strike out the defence to the statutory sick pay element but made a deposit order in separate reasons; liability was not finally determined. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declined to strike out or make a deposit order on the National Minimum Wage element because evidence about the claimant's working pattern was needed; liability was not finally determined. |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Rule 39 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2007] EWCA Civ 330
- Smith v Pimlico Plumbers [2022] EWCA Civ 70
- Working Time Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.