Case 2414443/2021 · Employment Tribunal
S Ferkova Respondent Skolak Healthcare Limited, trading as Beechill Nursing Home v G Ogungbola, Registered manager — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414443/2021
- Decision date
- 21 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
S Ferkova Respondent Skolak Healthcare Limited, trading as Beechill Nursing Home
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal’s written record states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £147.00 gross wages in respect of three shifts. It also upheld the unfair dismissal claim and awarded compensation of £431.40.
The unfair dismissal schedule breaks the award down as a £196.00 basic award, £214.00 for loss of earnings to 11 November 2021, £0.00 for loss of statutory rights, and a 10% uplift of £21.40 for breach of the ACAS Code. The schedule also states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 apply, with the prescribed element running from 18 September 2021 to 10 November 2021.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The extracted text therefore records the tribunal’s orders and monetary schedule, but not a fuller written explanation of the factual findings behind the liability decisions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay gross wages of £147.00 in respect of 3 shifts. | Upheld | — | £147 |
| Unfair dismissal | The schedule records a £196.00 basic award, £214.00 loss of earnings to 11 November 2021, £0.00 loss of statutory rights, and a 10% ACAS uplift of £21.40. | Upheld | — | £431 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £578
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £196
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £235
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.