Case 2414460/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr M Britton Mrs K Fidzinska-Pierce v PLL 1 Realisations 2021 Ltd (in administration) (Formerly Pure Legal Ltd) — 2022

Case reference: 2414460/2021
Decision date: 30 August 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ross Date

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Britton Mrs K Fidzinska-Pierce

Respondent

PLL 1 Realisations 2021 Ltd (in administration) (Formerly Pure Legal Ltd)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal held that the claimants' complaints that the first respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were well founded. The judgment records that the claimants were dismissed for redundancy from 2 November 2021.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a protective award under section 189(3) of the 1992 Act to the claimants, expressed as remuneration for the period of 90 days beginning on 2 November 2021. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations apply.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Complaint that the first respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; the tribunal made a protective award under section 189(3). No monetary figure was stated, only a 90-day protected period.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.