Case 2414462/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Greaves v Pets Choice Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414462/2021
- Decision date
- 12 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms A Roscoe, Ms A Berkeley-Hill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 6 and 7 September 2022, a tribunal chaired by Employment Judge Liz Ord with Ms A Roscoe and Ms A Berkeley-Hill gave an oral decision and later issued this short written record. It unanimously held that the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal also unanimously dismissed the claimant’s complaint described in the judgment as direct discrimination by association, holding that it was not well-founded. The written record does not set out detailed reasons for either outcome.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted record therefore contains the outcomes only and does not record any remedy or compensation award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records this only as a complaint of 'direct discrimination by association'. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic, so it is coded as other. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.