Case 2414495/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Kimberley Cairns v The Wellness Zone Ltd t/a Klnik — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414495/2021
- Decision date
- 13 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Kimberley Cairns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Manchester on 5-6 January and 7-8 February 2023, heard by Judge Brian Doyle sitting alone, the tribunal decided that Mrs Kimberley Cairns had not been dismissed by The Wellness Zone Ltd t/a Klnik and had not been constructively dismissed. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the respondent’s application for written reasons was granted. The respondent applied for costs, and the tribunal directed that a written application for costs and a schedule of costs be presented within 14 days of receipt of the written reasons, after which the parties could apply for a costs hearing. No costs award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed or constructively dismissed by the respondent, so the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.