Case 2414506/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Marsden v ZT Pubs (Black Bull) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414506/2021
- Decision date
- 13 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Humble REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Marsden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Marsden brought a wages claim against ZT Pubs (Black Bull) Limited. The case was heard by CVP in Manchester on 21 March 2022 before Employment Judge Humble. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name to ZT Pubs (Black Bull) Limited.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in the sum of £166.00.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £166.00. The written record also contains the standard notice on tribunal interest, but the judgment itself does not record any separate interest sum or any other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in the sum of £166.00 and ordered payment of that amount. | Upheld | — | £166 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £166
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.