Case 2414508/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Blabbermouth Marketing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414508/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not contest the proceedings, so the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21. Employment Judge Tom Ryan recorded that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The judgment title was amended to reflect the respondent's name as Blabbermouth Marketing Ltd.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation for deductions identified for 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17 and 18 September 2019. The individual amounts set out in the judgment totalled £594.78, and the tribunal ordered payment on or before 31 January 2020. The judgment also stated that the total sum was calculated without statutory deductions and may be taxable in the claimant's hands. The accompanying notice explained that if the sum was not paid within 14 days after 28 January 2020, interest would accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at the stipulated rate of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £595 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £595
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.