Case 2414574/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr Bansal Note: This case was conducted today as a Cloud Video Platform (‘CVP’) hearing. — 2021
- Case reference
- 2414574/2019
- Decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a single-issue judgment heard at Manchester on 1 October 2020 before Employment Judge Johnson, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Bansal at a CVP hearing. The tribunal dealt only with the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that the claim was not well founded. It therefore held that the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim failed and dismissed it. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.