Case 2414612/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Young v Stanley Property Services Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 2414612/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Young appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal held that her claims for unlawful deductions of wages, including holiday pay, and for a redundancy payment succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the unlawful deductions claim in relation to wages and holiday pay. The award for this claim comprised £2,633.35 for wages and £1,000.90 for holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £3,634 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal upheld the claim for a redundancy payment under section 135 ERA 1996. The award was calculated as 7.5 weeks at £301.45 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £2,261 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,794
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- part 2 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 135 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.