Case 2414617/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Brewis of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2414617/2018
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Carlisle
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms S Brewis of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal, brought under sections 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, was well-founded and that he was entitled to a remedy. The judgment did not set out the full merits reasoning because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal also found that the claimant contributed to his dismissal by culpable and blameworthy conduct to the extent of 40%. Case management orders for the remedy hearing were issued separately, so the written judgment does not record any final monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claim of unfair dismissal advanced pursuant to sections 94/98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. Remedy was to be determined at a separate hearing. The tribunal found that the claimant contributed to his dismissal by culpable and blameworthy conduct to the extent of 40%. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 94/98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.