Case 2414702/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Stelmach-Makuch v E.J.Foods Limited Edyta Dzieciatkowska — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414702/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Stelmach-Makuch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the proceedings in case 2414702/2019 were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the dispute and does not identify any award or remedy.
The decision names the respondent as E.J.Foods Limited and Edyta Dzieciatkowska, and it was signed by Employment Judge Hoey on 14 January 2020. It was sent to the parties on 23 January 2020. The text does not record any separate treatment of the listed unlawful deduction from wages or working time issues beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not set out any merits findings or a separate outcome for this category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not set out any merits findings or a separate outcome for this category. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.