Case 2414707/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Armstrong v MDD Catering Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2414707/2019
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Armstrong
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters dated 4 September 2020 and 1 December 2020, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to confirm whether it continued to resist the claimant's claims and to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the response should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The respondent did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Slater therefore ordered that the response be struck out on 12 January 2021. The judgment records only that procedural result and does not contain findings on the merits of the claimant's underlying employment claims.
The tribunal also stated that the respondent would be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the respondent's response for failure to actively pursue the case. The judgment did not determine the underlying employment claims on their merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.