Case 2414714/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K McQuire v Change Hospitality Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414714/2019
- Decision date
- 17 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K McQuire
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Batten Date found that Change Hospitality had made unauthorised deductions from Mr K McQuire’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £380.00 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay Mr McQuire’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,140.00 gross. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s notice entitlement, with £380.00 gross ordered on that claim.
The judgment records a total monetary award of £1,900.00 gross. The accompanying notice states that if the sums are not paid within 14 days after the judgment was sent on 17 June 2020, interest may accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at 8% from 18 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the gross sum of £380.00. | Upheld | — | £380 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered the gross sum of £1,140.00. | Upheld | — | £1,140 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s notice entitlement and ordered the gross sum of £380.00. | Upheld | — | £380 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.