Case 2414718/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jake Sorrenson v LGSD Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414718/2019
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jake Sorrenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place in public at Carlisle on 27 January 2020 before Employment Judge Hoey. The claimant, Mr Jake Sorrenson, represented himself. The respondent, LGSD Limited, did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages. It declared the deduction to be £765.59 gross, calculated as 93.25 hours at £8.21 per hour, and ordered the respondent to pay that gross sum to the claimant.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The separate notice on interest explained the statutory position under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but the judgment itself does not record any quantified interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared an unlawful deduction from wages in the gross sum of £765.59, described as 93.25 hours at £8.21 per hour, and ordered payment of that gross sum. | Upheld | — | £766 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £766
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.