Case 2414783/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Birchall v Wraith Energy Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414783/2021
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Birchall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Benson Date recorded that Wraith Energy Limited had failed to pay Mr J Birchall’s accrued holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £198.55. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided unless requested.
The judgment does not set out a detailed analysis or cite any legal test. On the face of the decision, the only substantive finding recorded is that the holiday entitlement remained unpaid and that the claimant was therefore entitled to the sum awarded. No separate split between heads of loss is given, and no additional remedy elements are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s accrued holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £198.55. | Upheld | — | £199 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £199
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.