Case 2414785/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Anderton v Iclean4 Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414785/2021
- Decision date
- 20 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Anderton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Mrs J Anderton v iclean4 Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy, and that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement. The hearing listed for 21 June 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £466.16 net in damages for notice, £1,602.00 as a redundancy payment, and £1,631.56 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment records no separate apportionment of the awards beyond those three sums and does not record any other claims or findings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; net damages ordered. | Upheld | — | £466 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,602 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,632 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.