Case 2414798/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Wynne v Medication Management Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414798/2021
- Decision date
- 29 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Wynne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe proceedings were issued on 19 November 2021. After directions were made, an unless order was issued on 18 July 2022 requiring the claimant to provide information by 31 August 2022. The claimant did not comply, and on 21 November 2022 Employment Judge Allen dismissed all claims except those relating to alleged deductions from wages in April and May 2020.
At the hearing on 22 November 2022, the respondent referred to the wage slips and bundle material and submitted that all payments potentially due had in fact been made, with proof appearing in the May 2020 wage slip. The claimant was asked whether that was correct and confirmed that all payments due at the time had been paid, although late, and that no money was outstanding from the respondent.
On that basis, Employment Judge Robinson dismissed the remaining claim. The judgment records that no further order, direction or judgment was needed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the remaining claims concerned alleged deductions from wages in April and May 2020. The tribunal dismissed them after the claimant confirmed that all sums due had in fact been paid, albeit late, so no monies remained outstanding. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.