Case 2414813/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Dewar v Gastro Synergy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414813/2021
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Dewar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, on that basis.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered Gastro Synergy Ltd to pay Mr A Dewar the gross sum of £934.66. The hearing listed for 22 April 2022 was cancelled.
An interest notice accompanied the judgment. It recorded 20 May 2022 as the relevant judgment day, 21 May 2022 as the calculation day, and an 8% stipulated rate of interest, but the judgment itself did not set out any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and orders payment of the gross sum of £934.66. No separate interest figure is stated in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | £935 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £935
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.