Case 2414818/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Edwards v Oak Tyres UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414818/2021
- Decision date
- 17 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brady Representation
- Venue
- Manchester ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Edwards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn the respondent's application, the tribunal heard representations from both parties and struck out Mr Edwards's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The reason given was that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim was dismissed. It was issued orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties on 17 March 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the pleaded cause of action in the extracted text. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had no reasonable prospect of success, and then dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.