Case 2414824/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr S Josic v Keedwell RT Group Limited and 1 other — 2018

Case reference: 2414824/2018
Decision date: 15 November 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge T Vincent Ryan

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mr S Josic

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing in Liverpool on 5 November 2018 before Employment Judge T Vincent Ryan, the claimant, Mr S Josic, did not attend. The first and second respondents, represented by counsel and a solicitor respectively, applied to strike out the claimant's claim on the grounds of non-attendance, alleged unreasonable conduct of the proceedings, and/or failure actively to pursue the case.

The tribunal refused those applications in the interests of justice and dismissed them. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the written record being sent. No substantive determination of the underlying employment claims or any remedy was recorded in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Respondents' applications to strike out the claimant's claim were refused in the interests of justice and dismissed. The applications were based on the claimant's non-attendance at the preliminary hearing, alleged unreasonable conduct of the proceedings, and alleged failure actively to pursue the case.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.