Case 2414827/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Lever v The Co-Operative Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2414827/2018
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Lever
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned on 27 June 2018 and alleged that the respondent had fundamentally breached the implied term of trust and confidence through the restructure process, the conduct of his line manager Gil Harvey, the disciplinary process, the grievance and appeal handling, and the proposal that he continue working with Mr Harvey. The tribunal applied the constructive dismissal test and considered whether the matters individually or cumulatively amounted to a repudiatory breach.
The tribunal found that the respondent had reasonable and proper cause for its actions during the restructure and that the handling of the claimant's application for the Senior Asset Manager role did not seriously damage trust and confidence. It found that the complaint by Laurenne Chapman was not without foundation and that it was reasonable for Mr Harvey to investigate it. Although there were procedural errors in the disciplinary process and the grievance outcome letters did not follow the respondent's templates or address every allegation specifically, the tribunal found that those matters did not amount to a fundamental breach.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant found the disciplinary and grievance process stressful, but concluded that any procedural defects were remedied or were not sufficiently serious to destroy or seriously damage the employment relationship. It found that the claimant had already formed the view that he could no longer work with Mr Harvey and that mediation was a reasonable proposed resolution. The tribunal held that there was no fundamental breach of contract, whether the incidents were considered individually or cumulatively as a last straw, and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as constructive unfair dismissal brought under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
13 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating v Sharp
- implied term of trust and confidence
- Malik and Mahmud v BCCI
- Bournemouth University v Buckland
- Frenkel Topping v King
- last straw
- London Borough of Waltham Forest v Omilaju
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Goold WA (Pearmak) Ltd v McConnell
- Assamoi v Spirit Pub Company
- Blackburn v Aldi Stores Limited
- ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.