Case 2414870/2021 · Employment Tribunal
D Shuttleworth v Pristine Communal Services (NW) Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414870/2021
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Shuttleworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Batten issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The hearing listed for 24 November 2022 was cancelled. The judgment is dated 3 October 2022 and was sent to the parties on 11 October 2022.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,140.48 for unauthorised deductions from wages, £1,140.48 in damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, £2,779.92 as a basic award after finding that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy, and £142.46 for holiday entitlement due on termination. The attached interest notice states that interest would run at 8% per annum from 12 October 2022, but the extracted judgment does not state a calculated interest amount.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,140.48 for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,140 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,140.48. | Upheld | — | £1,140 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment/basic award of £2,779.92. | Upheld | — | £2,780 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found unpaid holiday entitlement due at termination and ordered payment of £142.46 gross. | Upheld | — | £142 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,203
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,780
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.