Case 2414875/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Gunson v Redscar Kitchens Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2414875/2018
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss C Gunson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 October 2019, the Tribunal gave Miss C Gunson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Howard ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment is procedural only and does not determine any underlying liability issues between Miss C Gunson and Redscar Kitchens Ltd / Redscar Kitchens (Preston) Ltd.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no findings on the merits of the underlying claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. It records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.