Case 2414887/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr AW Dodgson v Weblaine Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414887/2019
- Decision date
- 20 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr AW Dodgson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined that Mr AW Dodgson's claim against Weblaine Limited for a redundancy payment under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £2,769.24 to the claimant.
The written reasons are not expanded in the extracted text beyond the outcome and sum awarded. A separate notice explained that interest may become payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sum is not paid within 14 days after the judgment was sent to the parties, with the relevant decision day recorded as 20 February 2020 and the calculation day as 21 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment under Part XI Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. | Upheld | — | £2,769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,769
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part XI Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.