Case 2414902/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Natasha Edwards v Parkhill Healthcare & Medical Aesthetics Clinic Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414902/2021
- Decision date
- 9 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dennehy Date
- Venue
- Manchester via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Natasha Edwards
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the underlying employment claims on their merits. After reading an email from the claimant dated 16 April 2022, it dismissed proceedings in case no. 2414902/2021 because the case was a duplicate of case no. 2414875/2021.
The reasons section states that case no. 2414875/2021 had already been dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant on 16 April 2022. On that basis, the present proceedings were treated as duplicative and dismissed. The judgment was heard at Manchester via CVP on 29 April 2022 and sent to the parties on 9 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal dismissed the proceedings after reading an email from the claimant dated 16 April 2022. It recorded that case no. 2414902/2021 was a duplicate of case no. 2414875/2021, which had been dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant on 16 April 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.