Case 2414909/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J O’Hara v Amber Taverns Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414909/2021
- Decision date
- 22 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J O’Hara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 August 2022, the tribunal gave Mr J O'Hara an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that he had failed to reply to the tribunal's letters of 1 July 2022 and 15 July 2022, had reportedly failed to comply with case management orders made at the preliminary hearing on 18 May 2022, and that it appeared the claim was not being actively pursued.
Mr O'Hara did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 16, 17 and 18 August 2023 was vacated and would no longer take place.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not list individual pleaded claims, but the case listing categories include disability discrimination and the tribunal struck out 'the claim' in full. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Parental leave | The judgment does not list individual pleaded claims, but the case listing categories include parental and maternity leave and the tribunal struck out 'the claim' in full. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not list individual pleaded claims, but the case listing categories include unfair dismissal and the tribunal struck out 'the claim' in full. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.