Case 2414910/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Charters v Westrose Leisure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414910/2021
- Decision date
- 12 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ganner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Charters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 3 May 2022 before Employment Judge Ganner sitting alone. By consent, the parties agreed that the claimant’s redundancy payment claim was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £4,097.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £399 gross. The written record states that the notice pay and holiday pay claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was £4,496.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | By consent, the tribunal agreed the redundancy payment claim was well-founded and ordered payment of £4,097. | Upheld | — | £4,097 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £399 gross. | Upheld | — | £399 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,496
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.