Case 2414920/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Second Claimant: Third Claimant: Mrs M Casey Mr D Taylor Mrs M Wood v Manchester Hall Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022

Case reference: 2414920/2021
Decision date: 15 September 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anderson

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Second Claimant: Third Claimant: Mrs M Casey Mr D Taylor Mrs M Wood

Respondent

Manchester Hall Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation)

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal considered the claims of Mrs Casey, Mr Taylor and Mrs Wood against Manchester Hall Limited (in voluntary liquidation). It found that all three claimants had been unfairly dismissed. The written record states that no additional sums were awarded because the claimants had already received redundancy payments and notice pay.

The tribunal also dismissed the complaints of age discrimination. No separate remedy was awarded on the discrimination claims. The published record is brief and records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with no written reasons provided in the usual way unless requested.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal found that Mrs Casey, Mr Taylor and Mrs Wood were unfairly dismissed. No additional sums were awarded because the claimants had already received redundancy payments and notice pay.	Upheld	—	—
Age discrimination	The complaints of age discrimination were dismissed for all claimants.	Dismissed	Age	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £0; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.