Case 2414923/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gilfedder v Maxi Haulage Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 2414923/2021
- Decision date
- 14 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Ms Plimley, Mr Wells
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gilfedder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 29-31 August and 1 September 2023 before Employment Judge Barker, Ms Plimley and Mr Wells. The claimant, Mr M Gilfedder, represented himself and Maxi Haulage Limited was represented by counsel. The Tribunal gave its decision orally at the hearing and later issued the written record on 14 September 2023.
The Tribunal unanimously found that the claimant was not dismissed. On that basis, his unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed.
The Tribunal also unanimously dismissed the claimant's claim for direct age discrimination. The written record does not set out further reasons, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The claim was brought as direct age discrimination and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.