Case 2414932/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Skelton v 1.Gino D’Acampo Worldwide Restaurants Ltd 2.Gino D’Acampo Hotels & Leisure Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414932/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Skelton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Skelton brought claims of unauthorised deduction from wages against two respondents. The tribunal, sitting with Judge Cowx alone at Liverpool by CVP on 11 July 2022, dismissed the claim against Gino D’Acampo Worldwide Restaurants Ltd.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim against the first respondent, Gino D’Acampo Worldwide Restaurants Ltd, was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim against the second respondent, Gino D’Acampo Hotels and Leisure Ltd, succeeded and the tribunal ordered payment of £6,647.43, subject to deductions for income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £6,647 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,647
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.