Case 2414933/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Griffiths v Burscough Boats Trading Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2414933/2018
- Decision date
- 29 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr G Griffiths
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 20 May 2019 before Employment Judge Robinson sitting alone. Mr G Griffiths appeared in person. The written judgment records that, further to the Case Management Order of 9 November 2018, neither respondent attended the hearing.
The tribunal made one substantive order: Burscough Boats Trading Limited was to pay the claimant £1,391 forthwith in respect of notice pay. It stated that no other order, direction or judgment was needed.
The attached interest notice states that unpaid sums under the judgment would carry statutory interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if not paid within 14 days of the written judgment being sent to the parties. No separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a single order that the first respondent pay the claimant £1,391 forthwith in respect of notice pay. The extracted text does not state any further reasons or identify a different legal label for the notice pay claim. | Upheld | — | £1,391 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,391
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.