Case 2414935/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Emily Beswick v Olive Tree Brasserie Preston Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414935/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Emily Beswick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Emily Beswick brought a claim against Olive Tree Brasserie Preston Limited for unlawful deduction from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal upheld the claim.
The judgment records that the respondent had not entered a response and was therefore not entitled to defend the proceedings, although it attended as observers only. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £193.31.
The accompanying notice on interest states the calculation day and stipulated rate under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but the judgment itself does not record any separate interest amount as part of the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim succeeded under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent had not entered a response and was not entitled to defend the proceedings, though it attended as observers only. | Upheld | — | £193 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £193
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.