Case 2414947/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J O’Connor v U&I Care Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414947/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J O’Connor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Mr J O’Connor’s claim against U & I Care Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £585.00 gross and unpaid pension contributions of £248.16 gross. The hearing listed for 04 March 2020 was cancelled.
The judgment does not set out additional findings of fact or any wider reasoning beyond the Rule 21 disposal and the monetary order. The interest notice states that interest would apply under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums were not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but no interest figure was calculated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21 ordered payment of £585.00 gross and unpaid pension contributions of £248.16 gross. | Upheld | — | £833 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £833
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.