Case 2414970/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Rowley v Arc Elite Agents Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414970/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Rowley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ross Date gave judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Miss J Rowley against Arc Elite Agents Ltd. The tribunal declared that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,067.28, calculated by reference to six years' service and a weekly figure of £451.92. It recorded that the respondent had already paid £3,389.40 and a further £200, leaving £477.88 unpaid.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay 17 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination, in the sum of £1,536.46, and that it had made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay £386 SSP. The judgment therefore ordered the respondent to pay £2,400.34 within 14 days.
The judgment notice states that sums payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the judgment was sent, with the relevant decision day recorded as 28 January 2020 and the stipulated rate of interest set at 8%. The hearing listed for 17 February 2020 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal declared that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,067.28. It recorded that the respondent had already paid £3,389.40 and £200, leaving £477.88 unpaid, which it treated as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £478 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay 17 days' accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,536 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay £386 SSP. | Upheld | — | £386 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.