Case 2414975/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Wroe Respondent Flightcare Limited v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2414975/2018
- Decision date
- 27 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr I Wroe Respondent Flightcare Limited
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Batten sitting alone in Manchester on 14 June 2019. The tribunal granted the claimant permission to amend his claim so as to include disability discrimination, framed as direct discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments. It also found that the claimant was a disabled person at the material time by reason of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The tribunal did not determine the discrimination claim on its merits in this judgment. The written record records only the amendment decision and the finding on disability status, with no liability findings on the proposed discrimination allegations.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim upon withdrawal by the claimant. It also struck out the claimant's unauthorised deductions from wages claim. No monetary award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | At this preliminary hearing, the tribunal granted permission for the claimant to amend his claim to include disability discrimination, comprising direct discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The tribunal also found that he was a disabled person at the material time by reason of type 2 diabetes mellitus. No substantive liability decision on the discrimination allegations was recorded in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's unauthorised deductions from wages claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.