Case 2414983/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Patterson v Mr M Nicol — 2022
- Case reference
- 2414983/2021
- Decision date
- 10 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ganner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Patterson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester CVP hearing on 3 May 2022, Miss D Patterson did not attend and Mr M Nicol appeared in person. Employment Judge Ganner sat alone. Pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal dismissed the claim because of the claimant's non-attendance.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, and it does not set out any liability findings beyond the procedural dismissal. It also does not record any award or remedy. The judgment was sent to the parties on 10 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend. The extracted text does not specify the underlying pleaded heads of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.