Case 2414987/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Legerton v Intrinsic Cleaning Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2414987/2019
- Decision date
- 4 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Legerton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 3 September 2020, before Employment Judge Slater sitting alone, the tribunal held that Mrs A Legerton's unfair dismissal complaint against Intrinsic Cleaning Limited was well founded. It awarded £8,224.35 compensation for unfair dismissal and a further £1,386.28 for failure to comply with a relevant ACAS Code of Practice, making £9,610.63 for that award. The Recoupment Regulations applied, with a prescribed element of £4,973.60 covering 5 November 2019 to 3 September 2020 and an excess over that element of £4,637.03.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £582.96 gross. It further found that the respondent was in breach of contract by dismissing the claimant without notice, but made no damages award on that head because the claimant had already been compensated for the relevant period of loss in the unfair dismissal compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint well founded and ordered £8,224.35 compensation plus £1,386.28 for failure to comply with a relevant ACAS Code of Practice. The Recoupment Regulations applied; the prescribed element was £4,973.60 and the excess over that element was £4,637.03. | Upheld | — | £9,611 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £582.96, being the total gross sum unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £583 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract by dismissing the claimant without notice, but made no damages award because the claimant had already been compensated for the period of loss in the unfair dismissal compensatory award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,194
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £8,224
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.