Case 2415000/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Martinez v Community Pubs Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415000/2021
- Decision date
- 28 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Richardson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Martinez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester CVP hearing on 22 February 2022, before Employment Judge A Richardson and with no attendance for the Respondent, the tribunal first dealt with limitation. It found that it was not reasonably practicable for Ms Martinez to present her claim within the statutory time limit, and that she filed the claim within a reasonable period after learning of the time limits.
The tribunal then upheld Ms Martinez's claim for arrears of holiday pay. It found the claim well founded and ordered Community Pubs Limited to pay her a gross sum of £560.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for arrears of holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations. The tribunal also found the claim was presented out of time but that it was not reasonably practicable to file within the statutory time limit and that it was filed within a reasonable period after the Claimant learned of the time limits. | Upheld | — | £560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £560
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable period after learning of time limits
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.