Case 2415002/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Smith v Riverside Health and Fitness Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415002/2021
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 21 July 2022, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to provide grounds, make written representations, or request a hearing explaining why the response should not be struck out. The extracted judgment records that the respondent did not provide grounds, did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the response. Employment Judge Phil Allen signed the judgment on 18 August 2022, and it was sent to the parties on 19 August 2022. The judgment also states that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment only records that the respondent's response was struck out after the tribunal's 21 July 2022 letter inviting grounds, representations, or a hearing request. It does not state the underlying substantive claim type or any merits determination in the text provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.