Case 2415033/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Watson Mr PR Cleary Mr C Shaw Mr A Kay Mr K Edge Mr A Coleman v Cussons Technology Ltd (in administration) FINAL HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415033/2019
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Watson Mr PR Cleary Mr C Shaw Mr A Kay Mr K Edge Mr A Coleman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 20 November 2020, Judge Brian Doyle sitting alone heard the final hearing by remote video. The respondent was not in attendance or represented. The tribunal declared that the complaint that Cussons Technology Ltd failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well-founded.
The tribunal made a protective award in respect of the claimants who were dismissed as redundant on or after 18 October 2019. It ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 18 October 2019. The extracted judgment does not state a separate monetary figure for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal held that the complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well-founded and made a protective award for the claimants dismissed as redundant on or after 18 October 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.