Case 2415043/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Kelly v IPG Pharma Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2415043/2018
- Decision date
- 29 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 9 August 2019, Employment Judge Ainscough, sitting alone, recorded that Mrs S Kelly’s unfair dismissal claim was successful. The judgment states that the Respondent, IPG Pharma Limited, was liable to pay a basic award of £1,524 and a compensatory award of £1,497.
The written record also records that the redundancy payment claim was withdrawn and dismissed, and that the unlawful deduction from wages claim was withdrawn and dismissed. The extract does not set out the tribunal’s reasons in detail; it notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The total award recorded in the judgment was £3,021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim successful; the tribunal awarded £1,524 basic award and £1,497 compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £3,021 |
| Redundancy | Withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,021
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,524
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,497
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.