Case 2415055/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Rutherford-Hacon v Health & Safety Executive (Inspector Julian Charles Tuvey) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2415055/2018
- Decision date
- 16 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
- Panel members
- Mrs A Ramsden, Ms D Wood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Rutherford-Hacon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a consent outcome rather than determining the merits of the case. At the hearing on 13 August 2019, the claim was adjourned by consent.
The judgment states that settlement terms had been agreed between the parties. It further provided that the claimant's claims would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant on or after 13 September 2019, without further reference to the parties, unless either party notified the tribunal before that date that the claim should proceed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The consent judgment does not set out the pleaded causes of action. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than being expressly named in the judgment text. | Settled | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The consent judgment does not set out the pleaded causes of action. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category rather than being expressly named in the judgment text. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.