Case 2415057/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Pemberton v Global Compound Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415057/2019
- Decision date
- 4 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Pemberton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 15 August 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr Pemberton an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with case management orders made at a preliminary hearing on 22 April 2020, which had been sent to the parties on 4 May 2020, that he had not replied to the Tribunal's correspondence dated 3 July 2020, and that it appeared the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Pemberton did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 23 September 2020 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the substantive pleaded claim; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the case. The claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance, failure to respond to the Tribunal's correspondence, and apparent non-pursuit of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.