Case 2415077/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Nixon v NWMS Southern Division Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415077/2019
- Decision date
- 1 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Nixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr C Nixon brought a claim for unpaid wages against NWMS Southern Division Limited, which did not enter a Response. The tribunal therefore entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and found that the respondent had withheld pay and made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £7,860.25. The extracted calculation shows this was made up of wages for 12 weeks and 3 days at £500 per week, less wages received, plus 15 call-out fees at £15 each, plus mileage for 7,500 miles at 45 pence per mile and additional insurance costs of £120. The interest notice states the relevant decision day as 1 May 2020 and the calculation day as 2 May 2020, but no separate interest sum is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The extracted text records wages from 22.7.29 to 15.10.19; that date appears inconsistent with the 2019 claim and is recorded as extracted. | Upheld | — | £7,860 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,860
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.