Case 2415100/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mears v DC Emergency Systems Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415100/2021
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mears
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Mears brought a claim against DC Emergency Systems Ltd for a series of unauthorised deductions from wages, arising from the failure to include overtime in his furlough pay between 1 April 2020 and 31 July 2021. The Tribunal joined case numbers 2415100/2021 and 2415109/2021 and treated the second claim form as a replica of the first. The Tribunal accepted that the claimant had been on furlough from 1 April 2020, later on flexible furlough, and that he had raised the overtime issue with the respondent during 2020 and again by grievance in March 2021.
The Tribunal held that the last alleged deduction in the series was the July 2021 pay period, that ACAS early conciliation began on 11 October 2021, and that the ACAS certificate was issued on 1 November 2021. Applying the time limit in section 23 ERA 1996 and the extension for early conciliation under section 207B ERA 1996, it found that the limitation period expired on 1 December 2021. The claim was not presented until 7 December 2021, so it was six days late.
The Tribunal further found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time. It relied on the fact that the claimant said he knew by around January 2021 that he could bring a tribunal claim, had already gathered evidence, had raised and pursued a grievance, and had no outstanding internal appeal to await. It also found that once the ACAS certificate was issued he still had about a month to present the claim, and rejected his explanation that he had sent the claim to Ireland and had not checked his emails. Because the claim was not presented in time and it was reasonably practicable to do so, the Tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was a series of alleged unauthorised deductions from wages, specifically whether overtime should have been included in furlough pay. The Tribunal found the claim was presented out of time by six days and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.