Case 2415111/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N G Ginley v Caffe Latte — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415111/2021
- Decision date
- 3 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N G Ginley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Manchester Employment Tribunals on 14 December 2021. The respondent, Caffe Latte, failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter on the papers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr N G Ginley £480. The judgment also included the standard tribunal notice about interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but no separate interest figure was set out in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined on the papers under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £480
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.