Case 2415123/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Thomas v BA Plastics Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415123/2018
- Decision date
- 20 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Thomas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim against BA Plastics Ltd (in compulsory liquidation). It recorded that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 1 February 2020 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the claim on 18 March 2020, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 20 March 2020. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of the claim or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not set out the underlying substantive allegation, but the GOV.UK listing for the case gives the jurisdiction code as Unlawful Deduction from Wages. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.