Case 2415138/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Wilson v HC One Four Season Nursing Home — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415138/2021
- Decision date
- 18 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered an unfair dismissal claim brought by Miss K Wilson against HC One Four Season Nursing Home. By a letter dated 4 January 2022, the tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, on the basis that she had not been employed for the two years needed to bring such a claim.
The claimant did not make representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success, because the claimant could not show that she had the right to bring the unfair dismissal complaint.
The hearing listed for 8 June 2022 was vacated and the case was brought to an end. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had not been employed for the two years needed to bring an unfair dismissal claim, and did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's letter dated 4 January 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.