Case 2415139/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Le’Surf v Golden Egg Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415139/2021
- Decision date
- 7 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Le’Surf
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment in Mr C Le’Surf’s claim against Golden Egg Group Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The only substantive order recorded in the judgment was that the respondent must pay the claimant the gross sum of £857.14. The judgment does not break that sum down into separate heads of loss, and it does not record any separate finding on a written pay statement claim in the text provided.
A separate notice on interest states that, if the award is not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, interest may accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990. The notice records the relevant decision day as 7 April 2022 and the calculation day as 8 April 2022, with a stipulated rate of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £857.14. | Upheld | — | £857 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £857
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.